![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhV2INlh576SiJ1WiEhFEWZ4nuRQH-UH2d2N20XgM9k_HrKWowK_d2hdUF3j4ux7IXMDsuEqNVJwjLDY0dvX7NKXH8mf4GU0pa4xpYy9foK__FMqqG3ejkXrQi5oo9bSeprG41dyo3TtYy2/s320/Saturday-119191495241779.jpg)
"So far, Daisy's reading lists have persuaded him that fiction is too humanly flawed, too sprawling and hit-and-miss to inspire uncomplicated wonder at the magnificence of human ingenuity, of the impossible dazzlingly achieved. Perhaps only music has such purity. Above all others he admires Bach, especially the keyboard music; yesterday he listened to two Partitas in the theatre while working on Andrea's astrocytoma. And then there are the usual suspects--Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert. His jazz idols, Evans, Davis, Coltrane. Cezanne, among various painters, certain cathedrals Henry has visited on holidays. Beyond the arts, his list of sublime achievement would include Einstein's General Theory, whose mathematics he briefly grasped in his early twenties. He should make that list, he decides as he descends the broad stone stairs to the ground floor, though he knows he never will. Work that you cannot begin to imagine achieving yourself, that displays a ruthless, nearly inhuman element of self-enclosed perfection--this is his idea of genius. This notion of Daisy's, that people can't "live" without stories, is simply not true. He is living proof." (p. 67)
An extraordinary novel, easily one of the most striking and best-realized works of fiction I've read in recent times; close to the "impossible dazzlingly achieved," perhaps by virtue of its own self-negation. My response to it, beyond this praise, is complex and to some extent riddled with contradictions; I would probably need a couple of thousand words and a few weeks of reflection to parse it.
Of the many many reviews available, I enjoyed Michiko Kakutani's review at The New York Times the most.
Two useful indices of reviews:
List of Reviews at Metacritic
Another List of Reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment